Since I was so young when it happened, I remember very
little about 9/11. Most of my knowledge of the event comes from what I have
learned over the years in school, from the Presidents’ speeches, and from stories
like these ones. I found these essays interesting because they are so vastly
different.
John Updike’s essay focused mostly on his emotional response
to the destruction of the World Trade Center. He talks about how it seemed
unreal-- almost like a dream. The way he writes seems surreal and dream-like as
well-- explaining how the tower “fell straight down like an elevator,” and how
the sky was pure blue, save for the huge cloud of smoke coming from the site of
the crash. Everything seemed like a nightmare that could be fixed by waking up.
But then he came to realize that it could not be fixed. America would never
fully recover from this hit. We would always remember that there is risk in
freedom.
Susan Sontag’s article was a much more political response to
the events of 9/11. She argues that America had this coming to us because of the
bombings and attacks we have led in Iraq. She states that rather than this
being an attack on civilization, liberty, humanity, or the free world, this was
an attack on the power of our country. It was a retaliation rather than an
unjustified invasion. She also criticizes the leaders of our country for hiding
the truth from the public and feeding on peoples’ emotions. She says the
leaders try to manipulate peoples’ responses to keep them from finding out the
truth of the attacks. Sontag wants us to learn for ourselves about the attacks,
rather than blindly trusting the government.
I thought both of these essays gave good perspectives to the
events of 9/11. Updike’s essay was a more personal experience that gave me
insight into what 9/11 was like, and Sontag’s essay reminded me to learn more
about what happens in our country and think for myself, instead of trusting
what our countries leaders say without a second thought.
No comments:
Post a Comment